RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Current BMOC


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 91
Date:
Current BMOC


Im not hating but it seems like most of names for the current BMOC are people who originally failed the exam. The job knew what they were doing when they decided to curve the list. The original list wouldve been exhausted by now. Congrats to all being promoted!!



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 619
Date:

The job didnt curve the list. The job has no say in what occurs that lies w Dcas and what occurred was Dcas doing. Most people, not everyone of course put the time in to succeed, not fair to say anything else.



-- Edited by Truthseeker on Thursday 30th of April 2020 05:07:58 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:

DeezNutz wrote:

Im not hating but it seems like most of names for the current BMOC are people who originally failed the exam. The job knew what they were doing when they decided to curve the list. The original list wouldve been exhausted by now. Congrats to all being promoted!!


 Dont they usually throw out questions? So what would make you think that this was a curve? Then I would assume that all promotional exams are curved. your comment is kinda hard to understand.



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 91
Date:

Caralho wrote:
DeezNutz wrote:

Im not hating but it seems like most of names for the current BMOC are people who originally failed the exam. The job knew what they were doing when they decided to curve the list. The original list wouldve been exhausted by now. Congrats to all being promoted!!


 Dont they usually throw out questions? So what would make you think that this was a curve? Then I would assume that all promotional exams are curved. your comment is kinda hard to understand.


Maybe my comment is kinda HARD for you to understand. The word curve was in quotations but obviously it doesnt come up after posting. I dont think anyone has a definitive answer on how this exam was graded. Anyway, congrats on your future promotion.  



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 194
Date:

They have always thrown out questions from what I have seen to make the list larger, it's nothing new. A lot of people benefitted from questions being thrown out, including myself. Some people studied their asses off and still didn't end up with the score they thought they would get.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 297
Date:

DeezNutz wrote:

Im not hating but it seems like most of names for the current BMOC are people who originally failed the exam. The job knew what they were doing when they decided to curve the list. The original list wouldve been exhausted by now. Congrats to all being promoted!!


 And how would you know this? Wasnt there only one list? 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 111
Date:

List was def curved. I know 3 people who went to the protest and scored 66,67 and 67 respectively but somehow made this list. Considering they had 10+ years otj their seniority points leap frogged over guys who had 3+ years on who actually got a 70 or higher on the exam. Sorry some people may not want to hear it but it was either curved or they threw away about 10 questions. So u say tomato I say tomato!!

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 297
Date:

GeoGo wrote:

List was def curved. I know 3 people who went to the protest and scored 66,67 and 67 respectively but somehow made this list. Considering they had 10+ years otj their seniority points leap frogged over guys who had 3+ years on who actually got a 70 or higher on the exam. Sorry some people may not want to hear it but it was either curved or they threw away about 10 questions. So u say tomato I say tomato!!


70-66 = 4 not 10. Guess you didnt do so well on the math part. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
Date:

GeoGo wrote:

List was def curved. I know 3 people who went to the protest and scored 66,67 and 67 respectively but somehow made this list. Considering they had 10+ years otj their seniority points leap frogged over guys who had 3+ years on who actually got a 70 or higher on the exam. Sorry some people may not want to hear it but it was either curved or they threw away about 10 questions. So u say tomato I say tomato!!


 This is how that can happen. 

Senior person originally gets a 65. They throw out 5 questions. They end up with a 77 after seniority. 

Rookie person originally gets a 71. 70 with 1 point seniority. They throw out 5. End up with a 76. 

Thats how a senior person who failed can leapfrog ahead. 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 215
Date:

I dont have a problem with seniority points. I know too many book smart guys in the higher ranks that get no respect because they havent done shiit in the streets. We need more supervisors Making these lists with time in rank.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 536
Date:

Threw out 9 questions. How would I know? I had a 61 at the review. I scored a 70 plus my seniority. I dont give a sh*t, passing is passing, no one cares for people who sh*t on others because DCAS did it the way they did.



-- Edited by No1isbetter on Thursday 30th of April 2020 11:25:24 PM

__________________

Youre all Keyboard Warriors



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 100
Date:

I thought it was already common knowledge that this test was curved? A couple of cops in my command (who previously failed 2-3 Sgt test BTW) failed the 2017 test as well. Then the list comes out and cops that failed magically not only pass, their list number is higher than some of the original passers due to the seniority points factored in.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 406
Date:

Who cares? They promote cool sgts at the end anyway

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 91
Date:

crap wrote:

I thought it was already common knowledge that this test was curved? A couple of cops in my command (who previously failed 2-3 Sgt test BTW) failed the 2017 test as well. Then the list comes out and cops that failed magically not only pass, their list number is higher than some of the original passers due to the seniority points factored in.


 +1



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:

TransitCop wrote:

Who cares? They promote cool sgts at the end anyway


 Lmao



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 228
Date:

they did actually curve this exam from what I remember...if you took the harder of the two exams( original and makeup) your exam got curved the difference between the average scores of each I think from both exams. Its how they solved the makeup exam fiasco. Now they take a new test, cant get the answers beforehand, and cant sue after they fail.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 102
Date:

Bottom line is if you are not on the list you failed regardless of the throw outs or curves. All three exams have bigger lists this time than previous ones. If someone with a 65 passed the test because of throw outs or curves they deserve it. If you didnt pass then you scored less than 65. A few throw outs are common in each exam. If that didnt help you then you scored low. Maybe you can study harder so next time you dont have to complain about curve or throw out. This exam is almost 2 1/2 yrs old. Lets talk about vacancies and future BMOCs.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 371
Date:

Yeah, who cares if it was curved? What does that prove at this point?

The List is about to touch 1,100 after 2.5 years. That a little under 500 promoted per year. The list is gonna hit 2,000 and thats it.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us