RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

unborn wrote:

---

wereinbacklog wrote:

---

 I'm 100% sure it stated operations for bomb squad and DEP Direct.  The other choices were 300 feet and establish command post.

---

It didn't say anything about DEP, I'm sure of that.

 

---

The four answer choices went like this in no particular order

(1) minimum distance of 300 feet

(2) establish command post

(3) notifiy operations for bomb squad

(4) notify DEP direct 

Comm to request ops to notify the bomb squad, 100 percent. Didn't say ops direct.

Did anyone else not give the conditions spot to SGT Ahmed because he was retiring. The 49 on page 2 asked for excusals for his party. I think I gave a point away. Jeez I hate this waiting on DCAS.

I remember reading the question on the PAR BUS/TRUCK supplement form and all the answers said either you "reference" or not but i don't remember seeing the word MARKER in the answers just reference, so were they asking you use the reference MARKER or the referernce BOOK?

The thing with that question is, did it really only say rental truck over 10,000 and biohazard placard (not hazmat). If it didn't specifically say commercial and hazmat then no supplement

Big guy, thats what I put but how f*cking grimey is that question

I know. If it had 2 supplements as a choice I would have picked. I thought I was missing something so I just went with 0 supplements

RISING IDIOT wrote:

---

Big guy, thats what I put but how f*cking grimey is that question

---

 Extremely! To not be clear if rental commercial is the same as commercial, bio-hazard is same as regular haz-mat, and since the cops requested  the tow does that imply the truck is therefore towed hence a condition of severity??!! Crazy but went with 0 supplemental cuz it didnt spell out it was indeed towed - if cond of severity in the PG was defined as a vehicle is "requested" to be towed then it would be do the supplemental. It doesnt so thats what i put.

One that i think is pretty cut and dry is the nursing home one--simply put she is choking and cant breathe. The rule is doa, cardiac, injury. Choking and not breathing is not the same as cardiac, cardiac means an issue with ur heart, ur heart could still be beating and normal while choking. People say well if u didnt do anything it would of resulted in a cardiac when she suffocated and heart then stopped, on other hand u can read into it saying she may also of been able to cough it up too who knows! Again--choking and not breathing is not a cardiac or injury so therefore i feel its go 98...

did it just say spilling coffee or red hot coffee which would be an injury or what??

Not sure... Did anyone else not see the memo about how to realign the sectors? I swear i read through that in-basket 3 times and I don't remember seeing that

Yes there was an item instructing you how to realign the sectors

And yes I said refardless, it's a word look it up, it's in the dictionary right next to abeyance.

Lol

Anything in a nursing home that can lead to death (asphyxiation due to a foreign object lodged in the throat) is not a routine sick at home.

If you think someone who is choking, especially who is at a nursing home is routine like a tummy ache
you dropped the ball.

The choking person was not a routine sick at home, they did the heimlich and it didn't work? You can't just go 98. It is an interpretation of what is and is not a routine sick at home and I guess wants you to use judgement? I guess as a straight PG question it is possible to challenge since it is not defined, but I went with doing the Aided Card which I believe is the right answer. Was the sector alignment as easy as looking at CO memo with the proper alignment with 6 sectors or did I miss some trick? It seemed too easy.

As for Sgt Ahmed retiring, I think I missed that, I forget who I picked and why, I was running out of time since I did the in basket last. As for giving the cop the "E" Day, I asked him if any other family members could take his child to the hospital, which did not grant or deny the "E" Day in the answer. The other choices I believe had you either granting or denying, I was looking for more info in asking if someone else in his family could care for the child. Am I right? I have no idea, it was a completely subjective in basket question and also how do you adjust a RC to someone if you are not even certain if you gave him an "E" Day? Then again there were two roll calls and I hardly think it mattered if you adjusted it or not for most of the questions.

The time for requesting the ambulance was wrong too (not to). It is 20 minutes.

Bumpy wrote:

---

owner of cell phone was blank

---

 It didn't matter, it was invoiced as "safekeeping" when the IMEI # was tampered with, should have been "investigatory" which is why it was wrong.

PatrolGuideismyBible wrote:

---

What did you guys pick for the other 217 Accident question with the guy that walked into a different pct than where the accident happened with a broken hand 6 days after the accident wanting to do a report for leaving the scene and a PAR? I thought that was tricky as Phuck!!!

---

I said refer him. Thats the one time you "break the golden rule"....i think

Does anyone know the correct answer to the Identity Theft question?

Thanks, I guessed that one correctly lol.

Anyone notice the mis-spelling in the street name of the map question? I believe it said allens street and the map said allen street. Also a choice later said "don nt" instead of "don't". Are these automatic throw outs??

 

Yes it is petit larceny by the business that was ripped off but the complainant in the question was the woman, so I went with ID theft in her resident precinct. Anyone have a copy of the Crime Reporting Reference Guide to confirm or debunk this? Even in the ID Theft PG procedure it just tells you to fill out pages 1 and 2 on Lost/Stolen Property/ID theft form and refers you to the crime reference guide!!!