RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: How many people will pass!!!!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1082
Date:
How many people will pass!!!!


I say 500.  This is because many that are freaking out were probably looking between an 80 to 95 on a typical Lieutenant test.  Now you will have between a 70 and 85.  This test will

eliminate the test taker that wasnt completely dedicated.  



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 570
Date:

Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Yes, even the patrol guide questions were very tricky and inconsistent in many of the fact patterns. Someone who knew the PG cold could still get a lot of them wrong bc the fact patterns and the choices were vague...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 316
Date:

hollar wrote:

Disagree... One didn't have to study hard for six months for this test


I am starting to think the same thing.....P.S. I am one of the idiots that dedicated 6 months of his life to studying

__________________




Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:

100-250 depending on the throwouts.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 407
Date:

I think there will be easy 500-600 people passing the scores won't be as high though. I'm just hoping for a bare minimum of 70%.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 80
Date:

Most P.G. questions were of the "trick variety." Studying helped, albeit not much. The PAR question was a set-up.

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

What was up with Uniform question, I tbought 2 people were ok?
Also the Truck & bus supplemental, I didn't even see the right answer as a choice and I know that procedure well

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:08:15 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

I thought the tattoo guy and hair clip girl were good to go. What was the wrong voucher? Money or phone?

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

They asked 4 good voucher didn't they? I put marijuana was good one Y i thought they were both good too.

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:13:24 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

Truck and bus I put 1 par and don't use the marker.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

I put the phone. The marijuana threw me off with the FTP? I thought that meant field test positive. But it should be POS

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

It's supp to be 2 truck & bus supplaments and no marker, but that wasnt a choice, WTF!

-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:15:44 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

They asked which voucher was good for signing off

counterfeit voucher= bad counterfeit usc doesn't vouchered

firearm voucher= bad round from chamber was itemized 2nd

cellphone vouchered = bad it was vouchered as safekeeping should be arrest evidence

marihuana= good



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

The 204 question the answer was the tatoo guy that came out in 2010, he doesn't have to carry the letter on his person



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:

Marijuana was missing the complaint number.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

Wasn't it the gun voucher that was wrong

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

So what was wrong with the girl with the small brown hair clip

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

It didn't ask which one was wrong it asked which one was good for signing.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

None of the vouchers had a 61#

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

It didn't meet the criteria for the supplement. Nobody was transported for medical or any cars towed

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

I thought the brown clip girl was good

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

I didn't see what was wrong with the girl with the hair clip but the most correct to me was the the umos with the approval of the co and wasn't carrying the letter. 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

For par question it's one supplement. and no reference markers for bridges/tunnels


__________________
n/a
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Yes the truck was towed for other than flat tire v

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

Negative, the truck was towed for a defect

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

They called a tow. Didn't say it was towed

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Can't bebone supp, comm vehicle over 10000 lbs, and other vehicle had hazmat placard

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

The Traffic Agent question about harrasment the answer was (49 addressed to Chief of Patrol) it should be chief of transportation.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

In uniform must have a letter.

__________________
n/a


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

The accident question stated that a tow truck was called but not that the vehicle was removed from the scene, therefore no supplement

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Uniform, double answer, par throw out. That's my opinion

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque

__________________
n/a


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

sig226 wrote:

In uniform must have a letter.


 U do not need a letter if the reason is for a tatoo and approved by d co.  The PG states it goes in ur personal folder and doesn't have to be carried.



__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

sig226 wrote:

Exactly. That vehicle was over 10000 something plus the driver had injury and his suv had hazmat plaque


 the driver had injury but not removed from the scene



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 313
Date:

He was treated at the scene. Even tho they requested a tow, no car was removed. No doa. No supplement! And I'm sticking too it lol

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 80
Date:

sig226 wrote:

In uniform must have a letter.


 Where does it say that anywhere?It should be  in personnel folder.

 

 

Also, the truck & bus question---the car had a biohard plaque.

How about the ammended PAR question? It says in the P.G. to refer them with leaving the scene cases, but it also says give them a MV104 if they don't qualify for MV104an



-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:25:52 PM



-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:27:28 PM

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Right, tattoo app by Co don't carry letter, goes in ur folder.
But the girls hair was ok too. That's why I say it's a double.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

Operation safe store dropped it big time((gotta call detective bureau duty captain. not co/duty capt
What about that retarded one with exploded dye pack...they wanted 2 procedures and none was indicated in answer choices

__________________
n/a


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

E D wrote:

Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed


 The question came down to two choices (Eliminate 2 since the reference marker will not be used accident occured on a bridge).  Both stated one par, and not include d reference marker, but one said no supplement and the other stated one supplement.  If in fact the supplement should be done then it should be two (placard, 22k lbs) instead of one.



-- Edited by wereinbacklog on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:26:07 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

It's supposed to be a commercial truck over ten k, the truck in question was a rental, the guy was treated at the scene, for it to qualify injury had to be fatal or he had to be immediately transported to hospital, the suv with the placard was the only vehicle that qualified. And I think when they requested the tow for the defect it inferred the truck was towed

__________________
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

Right there in 203-07, the note

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

Ok but truck weighted more than 10000. Doesn't it get supplement report?

__________________
n/a


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 467
Date:

QUALIFYING VEHICLE - for the purposes of this procedure is:
a. Any commercial truck having a Gross Weight Rating or Gross Combined Weight Rating more than 10,000 pounds
b. Any vehicle displaying a hazardous materials placard



__________________
n/a
E D


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Date:

If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns.
It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a
Choice.


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 407
Date:

IInfinity is right.it sucks I got it wrong

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 80
Date:

1. Didn't it say commercial rental? And,
2. Wasn't it a biohazard plaque?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1412
Date:

E D wrote:

If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns.
It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a
Choice.


 Bingo, that's why I choice no supplement because since they didn't give me the correct supplement amount I figured that d vehicle wasn't towed and the person was treated at d scene.  Either way a double answer or throwout.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

It stated it was a rental truck, not a commercial so it didn't qualify. The suv was the only vehicle that qualified, only one supp prepared

__________________
1 2 39  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us