RISING STAR ! The ultimate source to ace your NYPD Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain Exam Visit www.RisingStarPromotion.com to subscribe to our mailing list and get info on the next Sgt, Lt. or Captain Exam!
I say 500. This is because many that are freaking out were probably looking between an 80 to 95 on a typical Lieutenant test. Now you will have between a 70 and 85. This test will
eliminate the test taker that wasnt completely dedicated.
Yes, even the patrol guide questions were very tricky and inconsistent in many of the fact patterns. Someone who knew the PG cold could still get a lot of them wrong bc the fact patterns and the choices were vague...
What was up with Uniform question, I tbought 2 people were ok? Also the Truck & bus supplemental, I didn't even see the right answer as a choice and I know that procedure well
-- Edited by E D on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:08:15 PM
I didn't see what was wrong with the girl with the hair clip but the most correct to me was the the umos with the approval of the co and wasn't carrying the letter.
Where does it say that anywhere?It should be in personnel folder.
Also, the truck & bus question---the car had a biohard plaque.
How about the ammended PAR question? It says in the P.G. to refer them with leaving the scene cases, but it also says give them a MV104 if they don't qualify for MV104an
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:25:52 PM
-- Edited by OkeeDokee on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:27:28 PM
Operation safe store dropped it big time((gotta call detective bureau duty captain. not co/duty capt What about that retarded one with exploded dye pack...they wanted 2 procedures and none was indicated in answer choices
Backlog are u serious? Can't be. If a tie truck was called the car was towed
The question came down to two choices (Eliminate 2 since the reference marker will not be used accident occured on a bridge). Both stated one par, and not include d reference marker, but one said no supplement and the other stated one supplement. If in fact the supplement should be done then it should be two (placard, 22k lbs) instead of one.
-- Edited by wereinbacklog on Sunday 30th of October 2011 07:26:07 PM
It's supposed to be a commercial truck over ten k, the truck in question was a rental, the guy was treated at the scene, for it to qualify injury had to be fatal or he had to be immediately transported to hospital, the suv with the placard was the only vehicle that qualified. And I think when they requested the tow for the defect it inferred the truck was towed
QUALIFYING VEHICLE - for the purposes of this procedure is: a. Any commercial truck having a Gross Weight Rating or Gross Combined Weight Rating more than 10,000 pounds b. Any vehicle displaying a hazardous materials placard
If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns. It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a Choice.
If there is one cond of severity, the truck being towed, you Do a supp for every Qual vehicle. There were 2. The truck and suv with hazmat placard. U don't use ref marker for bridges and tunns. It should of been 2 supps no marker, but that wasn't a Choice.
Bingo, that's why I choice no supplement because since they didn't give me the correct supplement amount I figured that d vehicle wasn't towed and the person was treated at d scene. Either way a double answer or throwout.